Review Checklist

Does this PR follow the [Contribution Guidelines](development guidelines)? Following is a partial checklist:

Proper conventional commit scoping:

• If you are adding a new plugin, the scope would be the name of the category it is being added into. ex. feat(utility): added noice.nvim plugin

• If you are modifying a pre-existing plugin or pack, the scope would be the name of the plugin folder. ex. fix(noice-nvim): fix LSP handler error

• Pull request title has the appropriate conventional commit type and scope where the scope is the name of the pre-existing directory in the project as described above

• README is properly formatted and uses fenced in links with <url> unless they are inside a [title](url)

• Entry returns a single plugin spec with the new plugin as the only top level spec (not applicable for recipes or packs).

• Proper usage of opts table rather than setting things up with the config function.

• Proper usage of specs table for all specs that are not dependencies of a given plugin (not applicable for recipes or packs).

Cant php-cs-fixer me removed?

removed and force pushed

@wert2all Have you tested this pack yet? I see it imports the php pack, which uses the php-cs-fixer. Just want to make sure nothing collides.

@wert2all Have you tested this pack yet? I see it imports the php pack, which uses the php-cs-fixer. Just want to make sure nothing collides.

Yes, I created a PR from my config.

which uses the php-cs-fixer.

pint is wrapper over php-cs-fixer with some extra formatting rules, as far as I know.

@wert2all Have you tested this pack yet? I see it imports the php pack, which uses the php-cs-fixer. Just want to make sure nothing collides.

Yes, I created a PR from my config.

> > which uses the php-cs-fixer.

pint is wrapper over php-cs-fixer with some extra formatting rules, as far as I know.

Yeah I know that pint is a wrapper. What I am wondering is if you use the current pack as is, where its pulling in php-cs-fixer, could we end up in a scenario where both formatters try to apply different styles.

Yeah I know that pint is a wrapper. What I am wondering is if you use the current pack as is, where its pulling in php-cs-fixer, could we end up in a scenario where both formatters try to apply different styles.

I set up "stevearc/conform.nvim" to use one fornatter :

        php = { "pint" },
      }, 

How can I check how many formatters are executing?